DeWitt v. Kelly
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1ConcurrenceBussey, Justice
(concurring in result) :
I concur in the result reached in the opinion of Mr. Justice Littlejohn, but most respectfully dissent with respect to his treatment of the question or questions arising under the statute of frauds.
*228In my view, neither the clearly distinguishable cases of Footman v. Sweat, 247 S. C. 172, 146 S. E. (2d) 624, and McLauchlin v. Gressette, 224 S. C. 296, 79 S. E. (2d) 149, nor the general proposition quoted from 49 Am. Jur. 853, Statute of Frauds, Sec. 550, has any applicability to the facts of this case. 49 Am. Jur. 854, Statute of Frauds, Sec. 551, which immediately…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lorick & Lowrance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- McLAUCHLIN v. GRESSETTESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Price v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Footman v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- McCoy, Guardian v. HydrickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.