Legal Opinion

Skrypek v. Bennett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

When both the employer and employee are equally responsible for the delay in a disciplinary hearing, as is the case here, the employee may not properly be considered to have waived his right to back pay (see Matter of Fusco v Griffin, 67 AD2d 827 [4th Dept 1979]). Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to an award *920of back pay for the period of his prehearing suspension exceeding 30 days.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fusco v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rea v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Civil Services Employees Ass'n ex rel. Martelli v. Cortland Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Civil Services Employees Ass'n ex rel. Martelli v. Cortland Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Matter of Carcone v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Rea v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API