Skrypek v. Bennett
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.
When both the employer and employee are equally responsible for the delay in a disciplinary hearing, as is the case here, the employee may not properly be considered to have waived his right to back pay (see Matter of Fusco v Griffin, 67 AD2d 827 [4th Dept 1979]). Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to an award *920of back pay for the period of his prehearing suspension exceeding 30 days.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fusco v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rea v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Civil Services Employees Ass'n ex rel. Martelli v. Cortland Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Civil Services Employees Ass'n ex rel. Martelli v. Cortland Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Carcone v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Rea v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013