Legal Opinion

Braumiller v. Burke

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1921No. 2747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus requiring the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District to certify to them on the ground of conflict of its rulings in the ease of Braumiller v. Burke, 173 S. W., 609, with previous rulings of courts of Civil Appeals, the ease in which such conflict arises.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

'Relators brought this proceeding for writ of mandamus to direct the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth Supreme Judicial- District to certify to this Court certain questions of law — alleging that the case as made in the trial court is a case of boundary under Article 1591, R. S. 1911 and that the opinion of the .Court of Civil Appeals is in conflict with opinions in certain cases of other Courts of Civil Appeals.

We first address our attention to the question as to whether the case is one of boundary. If it is not, relators would have had their remedy by writ of error to this Court, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. FennerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. John Thatcher v. John MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cox v. FinksTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Schley v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Goodson v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Plumb v. StuessyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Van Perkins v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Bearden v. ScheneckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Braumiller v. BurkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. International-Great Northern R. v. MallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API