Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. LEIGHTON MICHAEL QUAPAW

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 2021No. SD36693Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SD36693 ) LEIGHTON MICHAEL QUAPAW, ) Filed: June 22, 2021 ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF NEWTON COUNTY Honorable Joseph W. Schoeberl AFFIRMED Leighton Michael Quapaw (“Defendant”) claims the evidence adduced at his jury trial was insufficient to support his stealing conviction. Finding no merit in that claim, we affirm. In reviewing a claim for sufficiency of the evidence, the appellate court’s analysis is limited to “whether there was sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LeticaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  2. State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. State v. BranyonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. CasconeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API