Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eltoron, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of City of Aliquippa

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1999Published

1DissentFriedman, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I do not believe that the record contains substantial evidence to support the Zoning Hearing Board’s (ZHB) determination that Eltoron, Inc. (Eltoron) obtained its building permit from the City of Aliquippa (City) through misrepresentation. {See Majority op. at 154.) Thus, I would conclude that the notice requirements of section 616.1 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC)1 apply here.

Eltoron applied for a building permit to renovate the property at 1 Constitution Boulevard in the City for use as a nude dance club. Part C of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Montgomery Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. GeigleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Hawkins v. Zoning Hearing Board of BristolCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API