Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1991No. 90-02412Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the appellant’s conviction for arson of an occupied dwelling. We agree with the appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in sentencing him under the violent habitual offender statute for an offense which occurred prior to the effective date of that statute. Binstead v. State, 565 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence imposed and remand to the trial court for resentencing. On remand, the trial court may impose an habitual offender sentence, if appropriate under section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), if the proper findings are made. Smith…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Binstead v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API