Legal Opinion

Conkling v. City of Springfield

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. Jambs A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by James C. Conk-ling, in the circuit court of Sangamon county, against the city of Springfield, to recover certain taxes which had been paid to the city under protest, and which were claimed to be illegal. The taxes were due in part on personal and in part on real property.

In the opinion of the Appellate Court will be found a quotation from the evidence of plaintiff’s agent, showing the manner of payment and character of protest, as follows: “I went into the tax office, and saw that the receipts were made out, and paid over the money for plaintiff.…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Lefevre v. County of LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Morris v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Rath v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  5. Davis v. Board of Education of Community Consolidated School District No. 115Illinois Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API