Legal Opinion

People v. Hanks

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2007No. Docket 266086PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted defendant of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(l)(a). The trial court sentenced him to 50 months to 15 years in prison. We affirm.

Defendant argues that the trial court’s policy of identifying jurors by numbers rather than by their names violated his right to due process and requires a new trial. Defendant did not object to the trial court’s referring to the jurors by numbers; thus, this issue is not preserved. People v Grant, 445 Mich 535, 546; 520 NW2d 123 (1994). This Court reviews unpreserved issues, constitutional and nonconstitutional, for plain error.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. HeftMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People of Michigan v. Vicki Renee DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. People v. ArmistedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. RoblesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Gray v. CheeksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API