Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 2, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Méhaeey, J.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for unlawfully, feloniously and carnally knowing and abusing a female under the age of 16 years. Appellant filed his motion for a new trial, which was overruled, exceptions saved, and he prosecutes this appeal to reverse the judgment of conviction.

Opal Sutton testified that she was 16 years old on March 24, 1928; that she knew W. A. Wilson; met him in December, 1927, and later, in December, met him again at Mrs. Carmack’s house, and that other persons at Mrs. Carmack’s went away and left her and Wilson alone. That, after they were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  2. Whittaker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Seaton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  4. Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Bowlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Goodnaugh v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API