Legal Opinion

The Prudence

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 13, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the libellants, the owners of the Schooner William D. Marvel, against the Steamtug Prudence, to recover the damages suffered by them from a collision, which occurred in Delaware Bay about 1.30 o’clock in the *940morning of the 14th of August, 1902, between the schooner and the barge Drifton in tow of the Prudence. The schooner was bound from Boston to Philadelphia, laden with empty barrels, and the Prudence, with three barges in tow tandem, laden with coal, was bound from Philadelphia to New York. The first barge was about 200 fathoms astern of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Mfg. Co. v. The MaverickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. American Manuf'g Co. v. The MaverickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tooker v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
  2. O'Keefe v. TiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API