Legal Opinion

Fults v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1993No. WD 46927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues in this appeal are whether the application to a prisoner of parole guide lines, promulgated after the crimes were committed, violated the ex post facto and due process clauses of the United States and Missouri constitutions.

Fults, a prisoner, sought a declaratory judgment concerning the applicability of parole guidelines. He asserted that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole had applied its 1985 parole guidelines to him in derogation of the ex post facto prohibition and his right to due process. Fults’ earlier appeal from denial of relief was dismissed as premature in Fults…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Delay v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Johnson v. Missouri Board of Probation & ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Elliott v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Miller v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Gettings v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API