Legal Opinion
CASTRO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1996No. ID 3279PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3279 Interim Decision #3279 In re Jose CASTRO-Padron, Applicant Decided June 14, 1996 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In exclusion proceedings, jurisdiction over an alien’s application for adjustment of status generally lies with the district director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. (2) The regulations at
8 C.F.R. §§ 245.2(a) and 236.4 (1994) grant limited jurisdiction to the Immigration Judge in exclusion proceedings to adjudicate adjustment applications that have been denied by the district…
2Cases cited2 opinions
3Cited by18 opinions
- Succar v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Zheng Zheng v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Scheerer v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Delia Ramos Bona v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Delia Ramos Bona v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- YAURIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.