Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hirsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1996PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the time of the alleged wrong herein, plaintiff was a Metro North crew dispatcher and defendant was her supervisor. The complaint alleges that in the presence of two other persons, defendant stated to plaintiff: "Do you have a problem? You take drugs. I’ve worked in the Towers and I know a person who is on drugs and you look like one. I’ve been thinking of sending you for a drug test.”

*207The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence with respect to the jury determination that the allegedly defamatory statement was actually made. However, the evidence of malice was insufficient for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jewell v. NYP Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Murganti v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Akpinar v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Penn Warranty Corp. v. DiGiovanniNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Torain v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API