Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Obetz v. Stinziano
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 2024No. 2023-0610PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 330.] THE STATE EX REL. THE CITY OF OBETZ v. STINZIANO, AUD., ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Obetz v. Stinziano,
2024-Ohio-5460.] Mandamus—Prohibition—Taxation—R.C. 321.31—R.C. 321.33—County not entitled to withhold future real-estate settlement proceeds owed to a city and reallocate those proceeds to other taxing jurisdictions as a means of offsetting past overpayment of real-estate settlement proceeds to the city under a tax-increment-financing arrangement—Limited writ of mandamus granted—Writ of prohibition denied.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Obetz v. StinzianoOhio Supreme Court · 2024