Legal Opinion
Plaza Forty-Eight, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 5, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-C-601Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REYNOLDS, Senior District Judge.
On May 8, 1991, plaintiff Plaza Forty-Eight, Inc. (“Plaza”) commenced this action in the Circuit Court for the County of Milwaukee, Wisconsin alleging defendant The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (“A & P”) breached an implied covenant contained in a commercial lease. On June 10, 1991, this action was removed to this court. Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
This court has original jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) and (c)(1) because this action is between citizens of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Anthony Koclanakis, Doing Business as Pan-Olympian Travel Agency v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Checkers, Simon & Rosner, a Partnership, and H.M. Walken Company, Inc. v. The Lurie Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Union Oil Co. v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.