Legal Opinion

Herrick v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1912No. 10410PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered January 2, 1912, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to obtain the construction of a will.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The parties to this action are the children and widow of Dr. P. B. M. Miller, deceased, late of Seattle. The purpose of the action is to obtain a construction of his will and a settlement of all of the property rights of the parties under the will. Dr. Miller died on December 3, 1904, leaving the will here involved, which he had made a few months previous. The only provisions of the will which we need notice in our present inquiry are the following:

“(3) I bequeath to my son, Hubert Livingston Miller, my gold watch and chain, all my medical library, surgical instruments and general surgical…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrison v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Havens v. . Sackett and HavensNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Washburn v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Payne v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Moss v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re Estate of PattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Bacus v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Wirt v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Tacoma Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NadhamWashington Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API