Legal Opinion
Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1981No. 13879PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
The issue in this personal injury case is whether or not plaintiff-appellant’s conduct should bar his recovery. Because we find the trial court did not commit manifest error in finding in favor of defendant-ap-pellee, we affirm.
This litigation arose from the following facts. The appellant, Brownie Reed Hebert, was employed by Southern Structures, Inc., as an iron pusher. In the summer of 1977 he was working as the foreman of a crew constructing a metal building in the Choctaw Drive area of Baton Rouge. Hebert had trained for three years at a trade school in the field of iron…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Cates v. Beauregard Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Boure v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hebert v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Broome v. GauthierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Sabella v. Baton Rouge General HospitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- E. B. Sessums and Sharon Sessums, Etc. v. Louisiana Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Hebert v. Gulf States UtilitiesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.