Legal Opinion
United States v. Miguel Adolf Valdez-Pacheco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2001No. 00-30006PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Per curiam
Miguel Adolf Valdez-Pacheco (“Valdez”) appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of audita querela, challenging his conviction and sentence resulting from his jury trial conviction in 1989 for various controlled substance offenses. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1989, Valdez was convicted after a jury trial on eight drug-trafficking counts, including engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848, conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute it, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Felker v. TurpinSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Ernest Bernard Moore v. Janet Reno, Attorney General U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donald Lorentsen v. Robert A. Hood, 1 Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Sheridan OrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Ricardo Lopez-Marroquin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gary William HoltCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.