Legal Opinion

William Eugene Swift v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1963No. 7086_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, William Eugene Swift, was convicted by a jury on an indictment which charged him, together with Jack Edgar McBride, with transporting, in interstate commerce, stolen casing and tubing having a value in excess of $5,000, with knowledge that it was stolen. The facts alleged in the indictment charge a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Swift appeals from a judgment sentencing him to imprisonment for a term of three years and six months.

The charge arose out of the theft of a large quantity of oil well casing and tubing from the Midland Supply Company pipe yard…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Pietch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Loren R. Gajewski and Mervin A. Gajewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Roy Gene Bond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  4. Benjamin George Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States of America, Appellee-Plaintiff v. Lorenzo Hubbard, Appellant-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API