Galway v. Shields
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Babruhl v. Lark, 35 Mo. 316 ; Gist v. Eubach, 29 Mo. 248 ; 2 Mo. 126 ; 11 Mo. 659 ; Gardner v. Armstrong, 31 Mo. 535 ; Self v. Cordell, 45 Mo. 345 ; Kratz v. Stocke, 42 Mo. 354; Mincke v. Skinner, éé Mo. 92. cited: Ells v. [Pacific B. B. Co., 51 Mo. 204; Charpiot v. Sigerson, 25 Mo. 63 ; Dickerson v. Chrisman, 28 Mo. 140 ; Story Eq.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Babruhl v. Lark, 35 Mo. 316 ; Gist v. Eubach, 29 Mo. 248 ; 2 Mo. 126 ; 11 Mo. 659 ; Gardner v. Armstrong, 31 Mo. 535 ; Self v. Cordell, 45 Mo. 345 ; Kratz v. Stocke, 42 Mo. 354; Mincke v. Skinner, éé Mo. 92. cited: Ells v. [Pacific B. B. Co., 51 Mo. 204; Charpiot v. Sigerson, 25 Mo. 63 ; Dickerson v. Chrisman, 28 Mo. 140 ; Story Eq. PI. 761; Beare v. Yallé, 2 Mo. 109; Chambers v. Lecompte, 9 Mo. 569 ; Johnson v. McGruder, 15 Mo. 369 ; Tibeau v. Tibeau, 19 Mo. 78 ; Depain v. Carter, 21 Mo. 331; White v. Watkins, 23 Mo. 423, 428; Young v. Montgomery,…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
Galway & Semple sued Shields to the October term, 1874, ■of the St. Louis Circuit Court, for goods sold and delivered, the amount of which was alleged to be $4,195.59.
The defendant denied the sale and delivery, and alleged that plaintiffs and defendant had made an agreement in writing, which he produced, by virtue of which they were to furnish him with the stoves and castings therein named, which defendant was to sell, and settle on the first of each month, for the articles sold during the previous month, by giving his note at ninety days ; that, if at any time defendant ¡should elect, he…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Roth v. GoergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Leahey v. LeaheyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1882