Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Roman Catholic Diocese v. New York State Department of Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1985Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevine, J.

While I agree fully with the majority’s disposition of the standing issue, I respectfully dissent from its holding that respondent New York State Department of Health (DOH) violated NY Constitution, article IV, § 8 in its use of the “50% rule”. This ruling, in my view, too broadly construes the constitutional requirement of filing an administrative rule or regulation, misreads the judicial precedent applying it, and will, I fear, create uncertainty in the field of administrative law where agencies announce or evolve guidelines to aid in making ad hoc decisions in performing their adjudicative…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. People v. CullNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. MATTER OF PARKMED ASSOCS. v. New York State Tax Comm'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API