Roman Catholic Diocese v. New York State Department of Health
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLevine, J.
While I agree fully with the majority’s disposition of the standing issue, I respectfully dissent from its holding that respondent New York State Department of Health (DOH) violated NY Constitution, article IV, § 8 in its use of the “50% rule”. This ruling, in my view, too broadly construes the constitutional requirement of filing an administrative rule or regulation, misreads the judicial precedent applying it, and will, I fear, create uncertainty in the field of administrative law where agencies announce or evolve guidelines to aid in making ad hoc decisions in performing their adjudicative…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. CullNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- MATTER OF PARKMED ASSOCS. v. New York State Tax Comm'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.