American Mining Congress v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. PIARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are plaintiffs Motion To Compel Compliance With The Court’s Injunction, oppositions thereto filed by defendants and intervenor-defendants, and plaintiffs reply. 1 Plaintiff seeks to compel compliance with the terms of an injunction entered by the Court on January 23, 1997, barring defendants from applying or enforcing a regulation promulgated under the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or the “Act”) known as the “Tulloch Rule.” Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court denies plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND
Because the background to this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- National Mining Association v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Gunn v. University Committee to End the War in Viet NamSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Green Acres Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Green Acres Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Green Acres Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- SEC v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025