Legal Opinion

Harness v. State of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1890No. 2900PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Mitchell. Tried below before Hon. T. 0. Conner.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto, instituted by the State to test the right of the mayor, marshal, clerk, tax assessor, and aldermen of the municipal corporation known as the “ City of Colorado” to exercise the powers pertaining to such officers of cities and towns incorporated under title 17, chapter 1, of Revised Statutes.

It appears that on the 11th day of February, 1882, a petition signed by twenty resident voters was presented to the county judge of Mitchell County, praying for an election under chapter 11 of title 17, Revised Statutes, to determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hoya v. DunsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Buford v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. City of Wichita Falls v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. State v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Young v. City of ColoradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Mathews v. State Ex Rel. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API