Dublino v. Natale Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit by John Dublino against Michael Natale and Anna Natale, his wife, for necessaries furnished to the family of the defendants. A statement of claim having been filed, the wife by an affidavit of defense denied that the goods were furnished at her special instance or request or that she made any agreement or contract for the purchase and sale of the merchandise or for the payment of the same; the husband offered no defense. A jury trial was had, and at the conclusion thereof, the trial court gave binding instructions for the plaintiff against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Moore v. CopleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Berger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Sawtelle's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- McCreery v. ScullySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swidzinski v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Albert Einstein Medical Center v. Gold, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1974
- Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
- Burns v. Birrell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1950
- Gentry, Inc. v. Maylath, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.