Legal Opinion

Sodders v. Fry

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 2011No. 403 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Police Officer Christopher T. Fry (Officer Fry), Ohioville Borough, and the Ohio-ville Borough Police Department (collectively, Borough) appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County (trial court) granting Richard Sodders (Sodders) a new trial because the trial court did not specifically instruct the jury on negligence per se as to both Officer Fry and Sodders even though both parties admittedly violated separate provisions of the Motor Vehicle Code (Code). 1 Discerning no error in the trial court’s opinion, we affirm.

This lawsuit centers around a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Shamnoski v. Pg EnergySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Talarico v. BonhamCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Brill v. Systems Resources, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J. Grove v. Port Authority of Allegheny County -- Appeal of: J. GroveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Dailey, G. v. Smith, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. BURNS v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Doe v. Riverside School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API