Legal Opinion

Beatty Ex Rel. Beatty v. Bowden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1962No. 96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, C.J.

A careful examination of the evidence introduced in the trial below leads us to the conclusion that the plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to require its submission to the jury, and we so hold.

The evidence adduced in the trial below tends to show that when the plaintiff first entered the intersection traveling in a westerly direction, the defendant’s car was traveling east on U.S. Highway No. 70 at a point approximately 900 feet west of the intersection, and when the plaintiff turned the Volkswagen automobile to the left, within the intersection, the defendant’s car was still about 400 feet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. McEwen Funeral Service, Inc. v. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Hyder v. ASHEVILLE STORAGE BATTERY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Bass v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. CothranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Kummer v. LowryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Kemp v. KnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Vestal v. CAPITAL MARBLE CREATIONS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Wrenn v. WatersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API