Legal Opinion

Alexander v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 29, 1994No. 94-00990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Hughes Alexander appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Alexander raises four grounds within his motion, however, only the issue concerning jail credit possibly may be meritorious.

In his sworn motion, Alexander claims he is entitled to 119 additional days of jail credit. While the allegations appear to be facially sufficient, neither Alexander, nor the court attach portions of the record to support their position.

We subscribe to the attachment requirement with respect to rule 3.800(a) proceedings. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Littlejohn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Sherrod v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API