Legal Opinion

Collado v. Boklari

Suffolk County District Court

Decided November 9, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

C. Stephen Hackeling, J.

Mitchell Gutkowski, the above-captioned respondent, moves this court pursuant to an order to show cause seeking to vacate a judgment of possession and warrant of eviction entered July 23, 2009 upon default. The grounds stated for the requested relief involve an assertion that federal law requires prior receipt of a 90-day notice to quit and assorted alleged defects in service of the referee’s deed, notice to quit and the instant petition. The above-captioned petitioner, Juan Collado, a foreclosure purchaser of the premises located at 58 Manchester…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. OwensRochester City Court · 2010
  2. GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. TaylorSuffolk County District Court · 2010
  3. IFS Properties LLC v. WillinsNew York District Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API