Legal Opinion
Demissie v. Starbucks Corporate Office & Headquarters
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 12, 2017No. 15-7082 Consolidated with 15-7101, 15-7111PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order enforcing the parties’ oral agreement be AFFIRMED.
Rahel Demissie contends that during the three years she worked for Starbucks Corporation, she- never received a performance review and so never earned a…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Elliott v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Jack Baker, Inc. v. Office Space Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Steven R. Perles PC v. Kagy, Anne MarieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- Bussman v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Madaket LLC v. Sweet Grace Distilling Company LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Paris v. Transunion LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669, U.A., AFL-CIO v. CCR Fire Protection, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.