Legal Opinion

Deming Inv. Co. v. Grigsby

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1917No. 7792PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error'from District Court, Pontotoc County ; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by the Deming Investment Company against James E. Grigsby and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff' brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was brought in the district court of Pontotoc county, Okla., on March 4,'1913, by the Deming Investment Company, plaintiff in error, which will hereafter be referred to as plaintiff, against James E. Grigsby and Lucy Grigsby et al., defendants in érror, who will hereafter be referred to as defendants, praying for judgment on certain promissory notes. and for the foreclosure of a second mortgage given to secure the payment of the same. The facts, briefly stated, are that J. E. Grigs-by and wife applied to the Deming Investment Company through its agents in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Common Council v. Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. German Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. LeavensWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Foreman v. NeedlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Porter v. RottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Holt v. Aetna Bldg. Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Sidney M. Massie, Individually, and Sidney M. Massie, as Executive Officer and Trustee of Massie Development Company v. Rose RubinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API