Legal Opinion

Hytken Bros. v. Hanover Children's Wear Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1929No. 28193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The Hytken Bros., merchants at Cleveland, Miss., ordered a bill of goods from the Hanover Children’s Wear Company through a traveling salesman living in Mississippi. The salesman went to the place of business of the appellants with his samples arid order book and took the order of the appellants for certain goods, listing them by lot numbers. These lots contained various numbers of goods, mostly dress goods.

It is the contention of Hiytken that when the goods came the colors were duplicated, and that there was an understanding that there would be no duplication of the colors of the different…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kanson Hat & Cap Mfg. Co. v. J. D. Blakeney & SonMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Nelson Sons v. Wilkins ParksMississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ormond v. HendersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hutchins v. Smith-HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Rubenstein v. Grossman-Winfield Millinery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Colossus Co. v. D. L. Fair Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. J. W. Sanders Cotton Mill, Inc. v. CappsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API