Haldeman, Admr. v. Pace

The contention that the Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction is based upon the claim that the petition in error was not filed within the statutory limitation and that there was a defect of parties.

There is no foundation whatever for the claim first stated. It is true that motion for a new trial had been made following the award of alimony, and that it was overruled January 11, 1930. However, the validity of that order was not questioned and is not involved in this proceeding in error. The question there presented arose from the sale of lands to satisfy the award of alimony, and was…