State v. Kobylasz
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMulroney, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.
I. In Division I of the .majority opinion it is held the trial court was right in submitting larceny from the person as an in-*1171eluded offense. Since the defendant was charged with, and the court submitted, robbery with aggravation, I feel the trial court would be right in submitting larceny from the person as an included offense were it not for what I will later discuss. But in this connection I wish to state that I do not subscribe to a rule that it would not be error under a robbery indictment to submit larceny from the person if the charge or proof was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- O'Donnell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilder v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.