Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Kobylasz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1951No. 47678Published

1DissentMulroney, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.

I. In Division I of the .majority opinion it is held the trial court was right in submitting larceny from the person as an in-*1171eluded offense. Since the defendant was charged with, and the court submitted, robbery with aggravation, I feel the trial court would be right in submitting larceny from the person as an included offense were it not for what I will later discuss. But in this connection I wish to state that I do not subscribe to a rule that it would not be error under a robbery indictment to submit larceny from the person if the charge or proof was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. O'Donnell v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. BarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  4. Kirchoff v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wilder v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API