Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bryant v. Rucker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1970No. 44667Published

1Dissent

Pannell, Judge.

I am authorized to state that Judge Quillian and Judge Evans join in this dissent.

The majority has failed to concern itself with rules applicable to motions for summary judgment by a party defendant on whom the burden of proof does not lie upon the trial of the case but on whom it does lie when such defendant makes a motion for summary judgment, and this is such a case; and has also failed to call attention to, and has failed to consider, pertinent and controlling evidence such as, for example, that the defendant husband had placed a sharp metal object next to a puddle of water…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. ChatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. PeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API