Bryant v. Rucker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Dissent
Pannell, Judge.
I am authorized to state that Judge Quillian and Judge Evans join in this dissent.
The majority has failed to concern itself with rules applicable to motions for summary judgment by a party defendant on whom the burden of proof does not lie upon the trial of the case but on whom it does lie when such defendant makes a motion for summary judgment, and this is such a case; and has also failed to call attention to, and has failed to consider, pertinent and controlling evidence such as, for example, that the defendant husband had placed a sharp metal object next to a puddle of water…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Fulton Ice & Coal Co. v. PeceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Saunders v. VikersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.