Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1984No. 55 E.D.Appeal Docket 1982Published

1DissentMcDERMOTT, Justice

Young women drivers, for actuarial purposes, have hitherto constituted a class. Among their other winsome ways, they have proved less accident prone than their young male counterparts. Insurance premiums were computed according to their actuarial experience as a class: being less accident prone, they received the concomitant benefit of lower premiums.

The Insurance Commissioner has, upon his own, decided that whatever the actuarial experience of young women as a class, young women are persons and should bear no actuarial adjective; that just because they are women, they cannot be classified…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API