Legal Opinion

State v. Shirah

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 4, 1983No. 82-1044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

The state has appealed from a judgment holding that the “bookmaking” statute, section 849.25, Florida Statutes (1981), is unconstitutional. We reverse.

The appellant, the State of Florida, filed an information charging the appellee, Michael Sanford Shirah, with five counts of bookmaking in violation of section 849.25 and one count of violating section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1981).

The trial court held that the bookmaking statute is unconstitutional and dismissed the information.

This case is governed by this court’s holding in the case of State v. Tate, 420 So.2d 116 (Fla.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CogswellCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API