Davis v. Vecaro Development Corp.

WELLS, Judge.

In his assignments of error, plaintiff contends that the trial court’s conclusions are unsupported by the evidence, unsupported by the findings, contrary to law and seek to vary the terms of the written instruments. Defendant contends that the written language of the contract is clear and that the trial court properly concluded that the transfer entitled defendant to a 12% interest rate.

“When the language of a contract is plain and unambiguous, the construction thereof is a matter of law . . . and it is the duty of the court to construe the contract as written.” Ins. Co. of North…