Legal Opinion

Watenpaugh v. L. L. Coryell & Son

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1939No. 30397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, District Judge.

The principal question for decision is whether the judgment on the verdict rendered in the court below for plaintiff, Irvin E. Watenpaugh, against the defendants L. L.. Coryell & Son, a corporation, and its employee Emil A.. Hebei, for damages to personal property, situated on adjacent premises, destroyed by fire alleged to have been *609caused by negligence, is sustained by sufficient evidence.

Defendants joined issue by general denial to plaintiff’s claim of negligence set out in his petition as:

“That on the premises occupied by the defendants * * * was a certain room,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mischnick ex rel. Mischnick v. Iowa-Nebraska Light & Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lezotte v. LindquistSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Emigh v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Stortenbecker v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Bargmann v. Soll Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dodge v. McFallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. McKinney Supply Company v. OrovitzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API