Legal Opinion

Cantor v. Department of Income Maintenance

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 23, 1985No. FILE Nos. 286528, 299890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSatter, J.

These are two appeals from decisions of the commissioner (commissioner) of the department of income maintenance (department) denying the plaintiff medical assistance payments under the title XIX medical assistance program, following a fair hearing held pursuant to General Statutes § 17-2b. The plaintiff appealed pursuant to General Statutes §§ 17-2b and 4-183, claiming that she is aggrieved as a result of those decisions and that the commissioner acted illegally, unreasonably and arbitrarily in denying her benefits. Since the appeals present common questions of law and fact, they have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenwich Trust Co. v. TysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Zeoli v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Local 1303 & Local 1378 of Council No. 4 v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Board of Education v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Board of Aldermen v. Bridgeport Community Antennae Television Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cantor v. Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. Sattin v. Brooks (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  3. Ahern v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Danielson v. Dep't of Income Maint., No. Cv90-0438151 (Mar. 11, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API