Legal Opinion

Moses v. Tigner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1935No. 4 Div. 114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

The act limits its application to counties, the boundary lines of which have been, since January 1, 1931, or hereafter may be, “altered or rearranged by the addition of new territory taken from any other adjoining County * • * if the County to which such territory is added have two Courthouses, or two offices where the Probate Court of said County is held and conducted” (Acts 1933, Ex. Sess., p. 120, § 1), a classification which, ás a matter of judicial knowledge, can only apply, in the absence of future legislation, to the county of Bussell. Henry, County Treasurer, v. Wilson, 224…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birmingham Electric Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Henry v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Mobile County v. ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Crow v. Board of School Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Bridges v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donoghue v. BunkleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Moses v. TignerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API