Arnold v. Lutz
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Story District Court. — Hon. B. M. Wright, Judge. This is an action for slander. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, C. J. —
The plaintiff brought her action in two counts. In the first, with proper innuendo, she charges the publication by defendant of the following alleged slanderous language: “Mrs. Arnold is too intimate with the hired man.” In the second count she charges the publication of the following slanderous language: “Mrs. Arnold has been sleeping with the hired man.” The first of these alleged slanders is charged to have been uttered on the 12th of June, 1906, and the second in the latter part of August or 1st of September of the same year. At the time of the publication of the alleged…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins v. Dispatch Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Barton v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Wimer v. AllbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Craver v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Wilcox v. MoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barreca v. NickolasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Valerie Bandstra, Anne Bandstra, Ryan Bandstra and Jason Bandstra v. Covenant Reformed ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Yocum v. HustedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Sullivan v. Malta ParkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ballinger v. Democrat Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.