Legal Opinion

Bogard v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1930No. 195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

We believe that this motion is well taken. The decision on the demurrer was not a final order nor judgment as defined by 11583 GC, as it does not conclude the rights of the parties as to the whole case or as to any branch thereof.

C. S. & C. R. R. Co. vs. Sloan, 31 Oh St 1,

Teaff vs. Hewett, 1 Oh St 511,

Longworth vs. McLally, 13 O. D. (Reprint) 2 Handy 131,

Hobbs vs. Beckwith, 6 Oh St 252.

The defendant might be acquitted of the immediate charge set up in the indictment, in which event he would be guilty of no offense, or he might be convicted of that charge and the proof be insufficient to show…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Whitlock v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. City of Akron v. MingoOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API