Toledo Society for Crippled Children v. Hickok
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood
Our petitioners — sundry charitable, religious and similar enterprises, including the Toledo Society for Crippled Children —seek in this suit against the respondents, who are the two children, widow, executors and trustees of the late Arthur S. Hickok, an Ohio resident, to establish their rights specified in Mr. Hickok’s will, but only to the extent of certain lands, and mineral estates in land, located in Texas. All of the parties to the suit appear to reside in Ohio or have their corporate offices there. The facts are without substantial dispute. The sole obstacle to the enjoyment by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Paschal v. AcklinTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Munsey v. Mills & GarittyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mills v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Ely v. Briley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Cardinal Industries, Inc. v. Buckeye Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- In Re Hickok's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.