Legal Opinion

Matter of Boyer

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho

Decided January 9, 1981No. 19-20145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MERLIN S. YOUNG, Bankruptcy Judge.

In each of these cases essentially the same problem arises. In each case the debtor failed to claim an allowable exemption in his original schedules. Subsequently trustee took action to obtain assets which could have been subject to exemptions had they been claimed by the debtor. Following trustee’s action, each of the debtors filed an amendment to their exemption schedule claiming an exemption on the asset sought by trustee. In the Boyer and Miller cases the asset is an income tax refund. In the Kline case it was an income tax refund and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re CobbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1980
  2. In Re MaxwellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  3. In Re SantoroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re CudeyroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Redmond v. Tuttle (In Re Tuttle)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  3. In Re CorbiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  4. In Re FournierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  5. In Re HurlesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API