Legal Opinion

Colson v. Baker

New York County Courts

Decided January 15, 1904PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Motion by a purchaser, at a foreclosure sale, to be relieved of his purchase. ^

1Opinion of the CourtCbane, J.

The question to be determined on this motion is whether a person seized in fee of an estate can, by a direct grant, deed the property to another and himself in joint tenancy, instead of tenancy, in common, without the intervention of a third party.

The facts in this case are these: Elizabeth G-. Baker and Mary Ann Baker, in 1897, being the owners in fee as tenants in common of the premises in question, made and *408executed to one Johanna Baker and the above-mentioned Mary Ann Baker a deed purporting to convey the premises to the said grantees as joint tenants, the deed specifying that the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Culbreth v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  3. Casey v. ButtolphNew York Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stuehm v. MikulskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. Edmonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Irvine v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. In re Transfer Tax upon the Estate of HorlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API