Legal Opinion

People v. Fatscher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By pleading guilty prior to the hearing on his motion to suppress his statements, the defendant forfeited the right to and precluded the possibility of appellate review of his claim that those statements were involuntary and obtained in violation of an invoked right to counsel (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686; People v Charleston, 54 NY2d 622). The defendant’s present claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not estab*453lished by the record and may be raised by a postjudgment motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (cf., People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852; see,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. FernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. PascaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. CataldoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. CharlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MarianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API