Legal Opinion

Divine v. Mitchum

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1844PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Woodford Circuit. Partners and partnership properly. Lien. Mortgages.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Bkecic

delivoicd the opinion of tlio Court.

William Oldham and John Mitchum, in 1833, made a joint purchase of a lot, in the town of Versailles, with a s{eam ancj cotton factory thereon, and engaged as partners, under the firm and style of Oldham & Mitch-um, in the manufacture of flour and' meal and cotton yarns. Mitchum, for large advancements alledged to have been made, for and on account of the partnership, and in the purchase of the property, claims a prior lien upon it, over the mortgagees and attaching creditors of Oldham, .for his individual liabilities. 'The validity of the claim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coles v. ColesNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Priest v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Whitney v. CottenMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Holmes v. Stix, Krouse & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  4. In re CoddingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1881
  5. Megibben's Adm'rs v. PerinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API