Ratliff v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
DEPLETION. - Where the petitioners were the owners of an oil royalty and sold one-half thereof for cash, they are not entitled to deduction for depletion upon the part so sold.
1Opinion of the Court
R. R. RATLIFF, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
VADA RATLIFF, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Ratliff v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 84460, 84461.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
36 B.T.A. 762; 1937 BTA LEXIS 659;
October 27, 1937, Promulgated
DEPLETION. - Where the petitioners were the owners of an oil royalty and sold one-half thereof for cash, they are not entitled to deduction for depletion upon the part so sold.
W. F. Tarver, Esq., for the petitioners.
J. E. Marshall, Esq., and J. H. Yeatman, Esq., for the respondent.
HILL
OPINION.
HILL: In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Macon Oil & Gas Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- Taylor v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- Ratliff v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937