Legal Opinion

Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Suarez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 24, 1999No. 99-332Published

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

In the obvious absence of a provision in the mortgage which covers the mortgagors-homeowners’ claim against the builder for construction defects which caused the loss of their home in Hurricane Andrew, it is clear that the trial court correctly declined to permit the appellant, the assignee of the mortgage, to assert an interest in the recovery effected in that case. See Clay v. Girdner, 103 Fla. 135, 138 So. 490 (1931); Orlando Hyatt Assocs. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 629 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Interdevco, Inc. v. Hollywood Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 523…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clay v. GirdnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Orlando Hyatt Assoc. Ltd. v. FdicDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Interdevco, Inc. v. HOLLYWOOD FED. SAV.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Matter of SchreweDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
  5. VAC Development Corp. v. AbelleiraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API