Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 1931No. [No. 98, October Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The object of this suit in equity is to require the repayment to the plaintiff of a fund of $12,000 paid by him to the Continental Trust Company under an agreement which he alleges to be void as against public policy. From a decree dismissing the bill of complaint, on demurrer, the plaintiff, has appealed.

The agreement was executed in July, 1928. It was primarily between the plaintiff and his wife, but appended to it was an acceptance by the trust company of the trust which it created in regard to the fund in controversy. The reasons and considerations for the agreement are stated in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kremelberg v. KremelbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  2. Roman v. MaliCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Cushwa v. CushwaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. Brown v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. Lord v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cronin v. HebditchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Maskell v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Baxter v. WilburnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Stevens v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Hertz v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API